Posts Tagged ‘literature’

Herta Muller’s Noble Prize Speech

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010


Nobel Lecture

December 7, 2009

 

Every word knows something of a vicious circle

DO YOU HAVE A HANDKERCHIEF was the question my mother asked me every morning, standing by the gate to our house, before I went out onto the street. I didn’t have a handkerchief. And because I didn’t, I would go back inside and get one. I never had a handkerchief because I would always wait for her question. The handkerchief was proof that my mother was looking after me in the morning. For the rest of the day I was on my own. The question DO YOU HAVE A HANDKERCHIEF was an indirect display of affection. Anything more direct would have been embarrassing and not something the farmers practiced. Love disguised itself as a question. That was the only way it could be spoken: matter-of-factly, in the tone of a command, or the deft maneuvers used for work. The brusqueness of the voice even emphasized the tenderness. Every morning I went to the gate once without a handkerchief and a second time with a handkerchief. Only then would I go out onto the street, as if having the handkerchief meant having my mother there, too.

Twenty years later I had been on my own in the city a long time and was working as a translator in a manufacturing plant. I would get up at five a.m.; work began at six-thirty. Every morning the loudspeaker blared the national anthem into the factory yard; at lunch it was the workers’ choruses. But the workers simply sat over their meals with empty tinplate eyes and hands smeared with oil. Their food was wrapped in newspaper. Before they ate their bit of fatback, they first scraped the newsprint off the rind. Two years went by in the same routine, each day like the next.

In the third year the routine came to an end. Three times in one week a visitor showed up at my office early in the morning: an enormous, thick-boned man with sparkling blue eyes—a colossus from the Securitate.

The first time he stood there, cursed me, and left.

The second time he took off his windbreaker, hung it on the key to the cabinet, and sat down. That morning I had brought some tulips from home and arranged them in a vase. The man looked at me and praised me for being such a keen judge of character. His voice was slippery. I felt uneasy. I contested his praise and assured him that I understood tulips, but not people. Then he said maliciously that he knew me better than I knew tulips. After that he draped his windbreaker over his arm and left.

The third time he sat down but I stayed standing, because he had set his briefcase on my chair. I didn’t dare move it to the floor. He called me stupid, said I was a shirker and a slut, as corrupted as a stray bitch. He shoved the tulips close to the edge of the desk, then put an empty sheet of paper and a pen in the middle of the desktop. He yelled at me: Write. Without sitting down, I wrote what he dictated—my name, date of birth and address. Next, that I would tell no one, no matter how close a friend or relative, that I… and then came the terrible word: colaborezI am collaborating. At that point I stopped writing. I put down the pen and went to the window and looked out onto the dusty street, unpaved and full of potholes, and at all the humpbacked houses. On top of everything else this street was called Strada Gloriei—Glory Street. On Glory Street a cat was sitting in a bare mulberry tree. It was the factory cat with the torn ear. And above the cat the early morning sun was shining like a yellow drum. I said: N-am caracterul—I don’t have the character for this. I said it to the street outside. The word CHARACTER made the Securitate man hysterical. He tore up the sheet of paper and threw the pieces on the floor. Then he probably realized he would have to show his boss that he had tried to recruit me, because he bent over, picked up the scraps and tossed them into his briefcase. After that he gave a deep sigh and, defeated, hurled the vase with the tulips against the wall. As it shattered it made a grinding sound, as though the air had teeth. With his briefcase under his arm he said quietly: You’ll be sorry, we’ll drown you in the river. I said as if to myself: If I sign that, I won’t be able to live with myself anymore, and I’ll have to do it on my own. So it’s better if you do it. By then the office door was already open and he was gone. And outside on the Strada Gloriei the factory cat had jumped from the tree onto the roof of the building. One branch was bouncing like a trampoline.

—————————————————

Continue reading her full speech text at Noble Prize

Sphere: Related Content

‘50 Must Read’ in 2010

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

 

  1. The Lonely Polygamist by Brady Udall
  2. The Stars in the Bright Sky by Alan Warner
  3. Even the Dogs by Jon MacGregor
  4. The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ by Philip Pullman
  5. Naming the Bones by Louise Welsh
  6. Known to Evil by Walter Mosley
  7. Monster 1959 by David Maine
  8. Manhood for Amateurs by Michael Chabon
  9. It Feels So Good When I Stop by Joe Pernice
  10. Chronic City by Jonathan Lethem

I will stop here at the 10th ‘Must’, yet you can continue reading the complete list here.

 

Sphere: Related Content

Stop all the Clocks

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010


Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone

———————————-

Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone,
Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone,
Silence the pianos and with muffled drum
Bring out the coffin, let the mourners come.

Let aeroplanes circle moaning overhead
Scribbling on the sky the message He Is Dead,
Put crepe bows round the white necks of the public doves,
Let the traffic policemen wear black cotton gloves.

He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last for ever: I was wrong.

The stars are not wanted now: put out every one;
Pack up the moon and dismantle the sun;
Pour away the ocean and sweep up the wood.
For nothing now can ever come to any good.

W. H. Auden

To my departed father, for his eternal silence.


Sphere: Related Content

‘Le Point’ in Memory of Oscar Wilde

Monday, November 30th, 2009

The French Le Point came up with a way out of a million to acknowledge the debt literature – in particular the English form of it!, owes to Oscar Wilde: to grace its cover page by a featured photo of Wilde taken by Napoleon Sarony.

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde: 16 October 1854 – 30 November 1900

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde: 16 October 1854 – 30 November 1900


Sphere: Related Content

Oscar Wilde’s Dying Words

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

Here is a quick route to Wilde’s last words – if you wonder what that might be. I received this via an admirably informative email from ‘Oscholarship: Oscar Wilde & the fin de siecle’ Group member John.

Thank you for sharing with us, John.

There were no ‘dying’ words of Oscar Wilde. Robert Ross who was present at Wilde’s death wrote to More Adey shortly afterwards saying:

“..at 1.45 the time of his breathing had altered. I went to the bedside and held his hand, his pulse began to flutter. He heaved a deep sigh, the only natural one I had heard since I arrived, the limbs seemed to stretch involuntarily, the breathing came fainter; he passed at 10 minutes to 2 p.m. exactly.”

In this letter Ross records the last articulate words Wilde had  spoken to him* a couple of weeks earlier (since Ross left for Nice in the interim). What Wilde’s actual last words were (i.e. not ‘dying’ words) has not been verified, so don’t believe the myriad examples you may find quoted.

spy

* Look out for some little cup in the hills near Nice where I can go when I am better, and where you can come and see me often.

‘Oscholarship : Oscar Wilde & the fin de siecle’ can be found here

Sphere: Related Content

“There’s a Story for You”

Sunday, November 1st, 2009

The last post mostly included the priceless words of Samuel Beckett in the narrative of  Molloy and Malone Dies; Yet, this one will divulge the labyrinthine nature of the narrative of The Unnamable.

The Unnamable can be considered as the last efforts of a distressed, relentless voice perturbed by the blurred definition of ‘being.’ A voice that is inclined to be as silent as its void surrounding demands it to be, while declining the inexorably boisterous nature of the voice sounds impossible. Therefore, the voice, though reluctant, follows the path of its precursors, namely, Malloy/Moran and Malone, in telling stories in order to mark the element of time quite passable.

Amongst the stories into which the voice either rushed or refrained from, I have selected a considerably short story, perhaps a love story of some kind, which follows:

They love each other, marry, in order to love each other better, more conveniently, he goes to the wars, he dies at the wars, she weeps, with emotion, at having loved him, at having lost him, yep, marries again, in order to love again, more conveniently again, they love each other, you love as many times as necessary, as necessary in order to be happy, he comes back, the other comes back, from the wars, he didn’t die at the wars after all, she goes to the station to meet him, he dies in the train, of emotion, at the thought of seeing her again, having her again, she weeps, weeps again, with emotion again, at having lost him again, yep, goes back to the house, he’s dead, the other is dead, the mother-in-law takes him down, he hanged himself, with emotion, at the thought losing her, she weeps, weeps louder, at having loved him, at having lost him, there’s a story for you, that was to teach me the nature of emotion, that’s called emotion [...] (406).

Samuel Beckett: "There is no name for me, no pronoun for me"

Samuel Beckett: "There is no name for me, no pronoun for me"


Sphere: Related Content

There is “a Rabble in My Head…”

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

A while ago I promised to update my blog with words from The Great Samuel Beckett, form his trilogy of Molloy, Malone Dies, and of course, the Unnamable.

Through my reading of the Trilogy, there were times when I thought, ‘hey, what exactly is going on? where is where, and who is what?’ who exactly should be considered as the viewpoint character – namely, the character who also occurs to incorporate the main narratorial voice of the ongoing narrative?’

Anyway, I could manage the hardest: reading the texts – all three of them, and making plausibly pertinent links with that one tough philosophical theory I picked as my thesis conceptual theory! The path was hard, yet the result happened to be acceptable enough!

Samuel Beckett’s prose oeuvre, to critic’s consent, is an amalgam of severe sense of characters’ individualism presented through the odd narrative of individuals’ dysfunctional mind, and the way they present their past deeds!

It was quite a struggle to stick to the main narrative – that in fact functions as a metanarrative itself, and not get distracted by the labyrinth of voices.

Well, through my super-duper re-readings of the texts! I found sentences, statements, and phrases which were priceless; words which transcend time. I thought I would share a few here.

Before I direct quote the following sentences, I should note that some of these selected phrases may sound offensive and/or obscene – thanks to Beckett’s literary merits!

You were warned, henceforth!

“How difficult it is to speak of the moon and not lose one’s head, the witless moon. It must be her arse she shows us always. (39)”

“What I liked in anthropology was its inexhaustible faculty of negation, its relentless definition of man, as though he were no better than God, in terms of what he is not. (39)”

“The Times Literary Supplement was admirably adapted to this purpose, of a neverfailing toughness and impermeability. Even farts made no impression on it. I can’t help it, gas escapes from my fundament on the least pretext, it’s hard not to mention it now and then, however, great my distaste. One day I counted them. Three hundred and fifteen farts in nineteen hours, or an average of over sixteen farts an hour. After all it’s not excessive. (30)”

“Certainly questions of a theological nature preoccupied me strangely. As for example.

  1. What value is to be attached to the theory that Eve sprang, not from Adam’s rib, but from a tumour in the fat of his leg (arse)?
  2. Did the serpent crawl, or as Comestor affirms, walk upright?
  3. Did Mary conceive through the ear, as Augustine and Adobard assert?
  4. How much longer are we to hang about waiting for the antichrist?
  5. Does it really matter which hand is employed to absterge the podex? (this is my favorite one??? hahaha)
  6. What is one to think of the Irish oath sworn by the natives with the right hand on the relics of the saints and the left on the virile members?
  7. ….
  8. ….
  9. ….
  10. ….
  11. ….
  12. ….
  13. What was God doing with himself before the creation? (another favorite!)
  14. ….
  15. ….
  16. What if the mass for the dead were read over the living?

Our Father who are no more in heaven than on earth or in hell, I neither want nor desire that thy name be hallowed, thou knowest best what suits thee. (167)”

“The search for myself is ended. [...] the catalepsies of the soul. (199)”

“Nihil in intellectu (218)”

“If I had the use of my body I would throw it out of the window. But perhaps it is the knowledge of impotence that emboldens me (218)”

“to live is to wander the last of the living in the depths of an instant without bounds. (233)”

“Sine qua non, Archimedes was right. (254)”

“For we shall soon die, you and I, that is obvious. (261)”

Samuel Barclay Beckett: April 13,1906- Dec., 22, 1989

Sphere: Related Content

George Bernard Shaw and HUMAN RIGHTS

Saturday, June 27th, 2009

In 1889, London, a man who described himself as a ‘conservative minister’ was arrested as an accomplice in the operation of a house of male prostitution. A trial was quietly and without notice, carried out. Then a publication called TRUTH broke the story as a sensational cover-up with promises to name names. Various well-known aristocrats were being threatened with penal servitude, blackmail and death-threats. Finally, some names were printed with the expected summons to law. With the solemn understanding that the crime in question involved adults and not children, Shaw recognized this as a violation of basic human rights and wrote to the editor of the threatening newspaper.

“I am sorry to have to ask you to allow me to mention what everybody declares unmentionable. My justification shall be that we may presently be saddled with the moral responsibility for monstrously severe punishments inflicted not only on persons who have corrupted children, but on others whose conduct, however nasty and ridiculous, has been perfectly within their admitted rights as individuals. To a fully occupied person in normal health, with due opportunities for a healthy social enjoyment, the mere idea of the subject of the threatened prosecutions is so expressively disagreeable as to appear unnatural. But everybody does not find it so. There are among us highly respected citizens who have been expelled from public schools for giving effect to the contrary opinion; and there are hundreds of others who might have been expelled on the same ground had they been found out. Greek philosophers, otherwise of unquestioned virtue, have differed with us on the point. So have soldiers, sailors, convicts, and in fact members of all communities deprived of intercourse with women. A whole series of Balzac’s novels turns upon attachments formed by galley slaves for one another – attachments which are represented as redeeming them from utter savagery. Women, from Sappho onwards, have shown that this appetite is not confined to one sex. Now, I do not believe myself to be the only man in England acquainted with these facts. And I strongly protest against any journalist writing, as nine out of ten are at this moment dipping their pens to write, as if he had never heard of such things except as vague and sinister rumors concerning the most corrupt phases in the decadence of Babylon, Greece and Rome. I appeal now to the champions of individual rights to join me in a protest against a law by which two adult men can be sentenced to twenty years penal servitude for a private act, freely consented to and desired by both, which concerns themselves alone. There is absolutely no justification for the law except the old theological one of making the secular arm the instrument of God’s vengeance. It is a survival from that discarded system with its stonings and burnings; and it survives because it is so unpleasant that men are loath to meddle with it even with the object of getting rid of it, lest they should be suspected of acting in their personal interest. We are now free to face with the evil of our relic of Inquisition law, and of the moral cowardice, which prevents our getting rid of it. For my own part, I protest against the principle of the law under which the warrants have been issued; and I hope that no attempt will be made to enforce its outrageous penalties in the case of adult men.” — George Bernard Shaw

George Bernard Shaw
(26 July 1856 ~ 2 November 1950)
Shaw, born in Dublin, moved to London when twenty.. His first success was as a music and literary critic, but he was drawn to drama. He decided to write plays, and continued to write them until his death at 94. He was fiercely proud of being a free-thinking humanist, dedicated to presenting the cause of human rights for all. He and Al Gore are the only people to have been awarded both a Nobel Prize and an Oscar: Shaw, (1925) for his contribution to literature and an Oscar (1938) for his PYGMALION screenplay. His dedication to encouraging all people to forge an individual path in life while taking responsibility for these life choices has been our inspiration at the Gingold Theatrical Group. GTG’s Project Shaw is dedicated to presenting every play ever written by Shaw. Produced and directed by David Staller, we’re now in our fourth astounding year. For more information check out
www.projectshaw.com

PROJECT SHAW
your monthly guide to reason
Projectshaw.com

Sphere: Related Content

Pitch ‘n’ Putt with Joyce and Beckett

Saturday, May 9th, 2009

Watching this, “I feel like I’m having a literary orgasm!”
I can clearly see Beckett’s “Not I,” “Molloy,” “Waiting for Godot,” and Joyce’s “A Portrait of the Artist…,” “Dubliners,” and “Finnegans Wake” properly put into it.
Love it!

Sphere: Related Content

A worm! a god!

Friday, April 17th, 2009

How poor, how rich, how abject, how august,
How complicate, how wonderful, is man!
How passing wonder He, who made him such!
Who centred in our make such strange extremes!
From diff’rent natures marvellously mixt,
Connexion exquisite of distant worlds!
Distinguish’d link in being’s endless chain!
Midway from nothing to the deity!
A beam ethereal, sullied, and absorpt!
Tho’ sullied, and dishonour’d, still divine!
Dim miniature of greatness absolute!
An heir of glory! a frail child of dust!
Helpless immortal! insect infinite!
A worm! a g o d!——I tremble at myself,
And in myself am lost! at home a stranger,
Thought wanders up and down, surpris’d, aghast,
And wond’ring at her own: how reason reels!
O what a miracle to man is man,
Triumphantly diatress’d! what joy, what dread!
Alternately transported, and alarm’d!
What can preserve my life? or what destroy?
An angel’s arm can’t snatch me from the grave;
Legions of angels can’t confine me there.

~Edward Young~

Nigh Thoughts. Night I: Complaints

Sphere: Related Content

Maslovian Approach towards Literature

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Initially, texts started to be looked upon from a much diversified and flexible theory in human beings’ case; however, it also was struggling to shed some light on previously vague and cloudy concepts of love, creativity, hope, loneliness, self-reverence, health, nature and noticeably ‘being’ in its sheer untouched meaning.

In 1943, Abraham Maslow chose a contradictory way of observation through which he not only eliminated the presence of invalids – either mentally or physically – as the sole source of his investigation, but more exerted to examine figures who were epitomization of maintained selfhood, prosperity and social achievement such as scholars and globally recognized figures; for instance Roosevelt and Einstein. As a result of such findings, he presented his “Hierarchy of Human needs: Humanistic Model;” a model which illustrated how amalgam of deviatory phases of success and existence might affect one’s pattern of life (Toward a Psychology of Being 49). By having leading features of both politics and literature observed, he depicted how an urge for meaningful existence in one’s life can be presented into reality; for instance, a literary work of art, a successful career, aimed educational efforts, etc.

Such preliminary concepts can simply be touched and relatively acknowledged through characterization in works of literary giants, i.e., those of Beckett, Morrison, Joyce, Hemingway, Conrad and so forth. In works of all previously mentioned authors’, one can conspicuously spot out how a desire for meaning and identity had turned into a pursued main goal of their characters. Take Beckett’s Trilogy: The Unnamable, Joyce’s Portrait of an artist as a young man, Morrison’s compound of projected anti-racist criterion for African-Americans in most of her novels say, Beloved (1987), Jazz (1992) and indeed Paradise (1999), and Hemingway’s clichéd The man and the sea, all can be taken as seriously earnest witnesses.

Maslow condemned Freud’s works as well, although he accepted the existence of an unconscious part within humans’ psyche. In fact, he refuted Freud’s idea that the bulk of our being is hidden far from our consciousness. Maslow purported that humanity is aware of motivation and drives on the whole. Without life’s obstacles, all of humanity would become psychologically healthy, attaining a deep self-understanding and acceptance of society and the surrounding world. He, additionally, directed his energy towards realizing the positive aspects of mankind, while Freud saw mostly negativity, repressed society, sexually abusive drives and death driven world which sounded more like Schopenhauer’s pessimism.

Source: Freudian Psychoanalysis and Maslovian Humanistic Psychology

Sphere: Related Content

Identity Crisis

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Identity Crisis

The term “identity crisis” was first used, if I remember correctly, for a specific clinical purpose in the Mr. Zion Veteran’s Rehabilitation Clinic during the Second World War, a national emergency which permitted psychiatric workers of different persuasions and denominations […] to work together harmoniously. Most of our patients, so we concluded at that time, had neither been “shell-shocked” nor become malingerers, but had through the exigencies of war lost a sense of personal sameness and historical continuity. They were impaired in that central control over themselves for which, in the psychoanalytic scheme, only the “inner agency” of the ego could be held responsible. Therefore I spoke of loss of “ego identity.”

Erik Erikson

Identity: Youth and Crisis 17

Sphere: Related Content

‘The Septembers of Shiraz’ Wins Sami Rohr 2009 Prize

Saturday, March 28th, 2009

DALIA SOFER was also announced the recipient of the 2009 Sami Rohr Prize Choice Award for her first novel, The Septembers of Shiraz (HarperCollins, 2007). She wins US$25,000 for a work that tells of the travails of one Jewish family in the period after the Islamic Revolution in Iran.
Source: Eric Forbes blog

Sphere: Related Content

An Evening With Grounded Theory

Sunday, March 15th, 2009

“Grounded theory can be effectively introduced in a survey course through a combination of lecture/demonstration and simulation. The class session presented here illustrates a way to introduce graduate students to the process of grounded theory and gain hands-on experience through simulation. The lesson utilizes concepts that the students are familiar with, allowing them to focus on the research process, and encourages internalization of concepts through immediate application.”

Download the paper <here!>

By:Frances Huehls

Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana

The Qualitative Report Volume 10 Number 2 June 2005 328-338

Sphere: Related Content

“Slow Dance”

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

~ SLOW DANCE ~

Have you ever watched kids
On a merry-go-round?
Or listened to the rain
Slapping on the ground?
Ever followed a butterfly’s erratic flight?
Or gazed at the sun into the fading night?
You’d better slow down.
Don’t dance so fast.
Time is short.
The music won’t last.

Do you run through each day
On the fly?
When you ask “How are you?”
Do you hear the reply?
When the day is done
Do you lie in your bed
With the next hundred chores
Running through your head?
You’d better slow down
Don’t dance so fast.
Time is short.
The music won’t last.

Ever told your child,
We’ll do it tomorrow?
And in your haste,
Not see his sorrow?
Ever lost touch,
Let a good friendship die
Cause you never had time
To call and say “Hi”?
You’d better slow down.
Don’t dance so fast.
Time is short.
The music won’t last.

When you run so fast to get somewhere
You miss half the fun of getting there.
When you worry and hurry through your day,
It is like an unopened gift….
Thrown away.
Life is not a race.
Do take it slower
Hear the music
Before the song is over.

—–

It is reported said that the poem above is written by a terminally ill girl hospitalized in New York Hospital. However, there wasn’t any possible contact information with which one may affirm its authenticity. Perhaps, it is part of infamous and globetrotting chain-letters /emails.

It is posted here due much to its beauty hidden in uttermost simplicity of the words.

You be the Judge!

Sphere: Related Content

What if…!

Sunday, February 15th, 2009

“What if, some day or night, a demon were to steal after you in your loneliest loneliness and say to you: “This life as you now live it and have lived it, you will have to live once more and innumerable times more; and there will be nothing new in it, but every pain and every joy and every thought and sigh and everything unutterably small or great in your life will have to return to you, all in the same succession and sequence—even this spider and this moonlight between the trees, and even this moment and I myself. The eternal hourglass of existence is turned upside down again and again—and you with it, speck of dust!”

Friedrich Nietzsche, The G a y Science

Sphere: Related Content

~ Requiem ~

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

It came to me the other day:
Were I to die, no one would say,
“Oh, what a shame! So young, so full
Of promise — depths unplumbable!”

Instead, a shrug and tearless eyes
Will greet my overdue demise;
The wide response will be, I know,
“I thought he died a while ago.”

For life’s a shabby subterfuge,
And death is real, and dark, and huge.
The shock of it will register
Nowhere but where it will occur.

JOHN UPDIKE

Sphere: Related Content

“HOW BIG CAN YOU THINK?”

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

HOW BIG CAN YOU THINK?

I took my hands off the wheel and held them wider than an elephant’s c o c k.

That big, sister-fkcr!’  ” (247)

——

It has been a while since I have finished reading The White Tiger, the winner of 2008  Man Booker Prize. I was wondering how I might be able to put all the wonderful efforts in the narrative of this title into a summary of a few paragraphs or even pages; I figured out, then, that it is virtually impossible without spoiling some bits and/or destroying the whole narrtological wonders of the story. Therefore, I decided not to go quid pro quo, but, in fact, go with the “save the narrative, save the world!” thing.

In my personal perspective, The White Tiger indeed deserved to be the 2008 Man Booker Prize Winner by all possible means; a revolutionary narrative of what truly can be found underneath a glorious and glittering skin of Mumbai, accompanied by a fast-paced storyline that narrates events which might have happened to actual people, or are happening even in the time being.

The whole story reveals a cunning sarcastic and sort of philippic language, or at least a figurative language which connotes an opposing mind, and an angry individual that senses all the ongoing unfairness of the time. A retaliatory narrative that justified its rebelling nature when it came to exploitative concepts dominant in not only India but all other major counties with the same or partially same communal systems, i.e, the cast system, bourgeois vs. proletariat, and corrupt and depraved law enforcement systems.

The narrator, who eventually decides to name himself Ashok Sharma – probably after his almost successful and rich ex-master, finds his success and future in one unforgettable act, murdering the master and … (no spoiler, sorry!)

This, however, should not be ignored that such an immensely horrendous act, which might sound unforgettable to most common senses, later turns out to have been taken for granted by the narrator as a warrant for his future. The White Tiger, or the narrator, simply forgets the very act of murder, but the mistakes that his master made which eventuated his death seem to have survived narrator’s repressive mind.

In the story of The White Tiger, there are myriad of referances to items that can be considered as ‘typicality of a prospective murder scene’ within the next couple of hundreds of pages. Stereotypes such as, a growing tendency in intently considering alcoholism as the most attainable escape-hatch for the current or upcoming hardships, sensual indulgence -  in our narrator’s case can be sensed as natural erotic responses towards women, a formed double-consciousness by which the involved individuals can maintain the current vocational positions – this can be seen as a friendly slave-master attitude that the narrator holds whenever his master confronts an emotional issue.

Here, I very much like to quote some parts of the book which I found deeply descriptive of the sort of narration implemented into the body of the novel.

My whole life I’ve been treated like a donkey. All I want is that one son of mine – at least one – should live like a man.

What it meant to live like a man was a mystery. I though it meant being like Vijay, the bus conductor.

[...] Vijay family were pigherds, which meant they were the lowest of the low(26).

‘He’s the Great Socialist.’

‘ Good. And what is the Great Socialist’s message for little children?’

‘ Any boy in any village can grow up to become the prime minister of India. That is the message to little children all over this land.’

The inspector pointed his cane straight at me. ‘ You, young man, are an intelligent, honest, vivacious fellow in this crowd of thugs and idiots. In any jungle, what is the rarest of animals – the creature that comes along only once in a generation?’

I thought about it and said:

‘The white tiger.’

‘That’s what you are, in this jungle’(30).

I am India’s most faithful voter, and I still have not seen the inside of a voting booth (86).

Ram Bahadur glared at me, so I said, ‘all right, sir.’ (servants incidentally, are obssessed with being called ’sir’ by other servants, sir.)(89)

The moment the Mongoose left, I swear, the skirts became even shorter.

When she sat in the back, I could see half her ‘bo obs’ hanging out of her clothes each time I had to look in the rearview mirror(120).

“ARAVIND ADIGA was born in Madras, India, in 1974, but now lives in Bombay. He completed his schooling in India and Australia. He graduated from Columbia University in New York with a B.A. in English literature. After his B.A., he went on a scholarship from Columbia to Magdalen College, Oxford, where he received his M.Phil. in English literature. He went into journalism in 2000 through an internship at the Washington, D.C. bureau of the Financial Times. He worked as a financial correspondent in New York for two and a half years, covering investment and the stock market. In 2003, he returned to India as a correspondent for Time magazine. The Sunday Times of London called his first novel, The White Tiger, a “completely bald, angry, unadorned portrait of the country as seen from the bottom of the heap; there’s not a sniff of saffron or a swirl of sari anywhere.” The White Tiger was announced the winner of the 2008 Man Booker Prize for Fiction on October 14, 2008. He is the fourth Indian-born author to win the Booker Prize since it was launched in 1969, joining Kiran Desai, Arundhati Roy and Salman Rushdie. He is also the second youngest winner in the prize’s 40-year history.”

Aravind’s ‘Bio’ Selected from: Eric Forbes

Sphere: Related Content

Septembers of Shiraz

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

Get the Flash Player to see the wordTube Media Player.

This is a 22 minutes intro of New York best seller, “Septembers of Shiraz,” written by Dalia Sofer.

Dalia Sofer, a Jewish Iranian-born American writer, shares her thrilling autobiographic story of her brief years in Iran, her eventual move to New York and other pertinent narratives which topped her story to be a best seller in 2007, to most critics acclaim.
The novel itself follows a constant and anticipative pace of narration while revealing different layers of then-newly establish government in her country.

First off, we’ll be listening to the editor of ‘One Story Magazine,’ and then it’ll be the author herself who will sweetly take us through the first few pages of the novel.

Sphere: Related Content

Falseness of an Opinion

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

4. The falseness of an opinion is not for us any
objection to it: it is here, perhaps, that our new language
sounds most strangely. The question is, how far an
opinion is life-furthering, life- preserving, species preserving,
perhaps species-rearing, and we are
fundamentally inclined to maintain that the falsest opinions
(to which the synthetic judgments a priori belong), are the
most indispensable to us, that without a recognition of
logical fictions, without a comparison of reality with the
purely IMAGINED world of the absolute and immutable,
without a constant counterfeiting of the world by means
of numbers, man could not live—that the renunciation of
false opinions would be a renunciation of life, a negation
of life. TO RECOGNISE UNTRUTH AS A
CONDITION OF LIFE; that is certainly to impugn the
traditional ideas of value in a dangerous manner, and a
philosophy which ventures to do so, has thereby alone
placed itself beyond good and evil.
F. Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil 10; #4.

Sphere: Related Content

Copy Protected by Chetan's WP-CopyProtect.